More than 40 years ago, philosopher Gilles Deleuze argued that true art is inseparable from the physical and emotional struggles of humans facing chaos.
Deleuze believed that what makes art possible begins with a direct experience of artist engagement and uncertainty. This is something that the algorithm cannot replicate.
“If someone puts life into painting and fights against clichés, it’s not a school movement.” Transcripts From him 1981 Seminar I’ll read it.
What is important “It’s an act of struggle, to push back cliches and to put out something,” Deleuze revealed in a later written edition.
Today, Deleuze’s warnings are more relevant than ever, as mostly cliched AI-generated art quickly fills online platforms. AI tools driven by advanced algorithms allow you to create works with images, music, and even minimal human touch. Simple prompt.
The ongoing controversy surrounding AI highlights tensions over the content generated in AI.
Last week, YouTube creator Mrbeast I retreated A thumbnail tool generated by AI after rebeling artist rights. May, Elton John It was criticized The UK government’s AI copyright proposal has been proposed as “deeply concerned” for artists.
AI companies face legal disputes like humanity, meta and Openai Lyrics generated by AI,training Copyrighted booksand broader questions about whether training AI models constitute Fair use.
Human wisdom, artificial limits
Max Li, founder and CEO of the decentralized cloud computing platform OORT, is Decryption The interviews show that AI’s capabilities are fundamentally limited by human-defined origins.
“What appears to be appearing in AI is still based on human-initiated structures,” explains Li. Decrypt’s question.
Li, its platform leverages distributed infrastructure to support AI workloads Agent trading modeleven advanced models claim that they remain limited by human-set architectures, datasets and training goals.
Although AI systems can “emulate certain patterns of reasoning or behavior,” they “have no “that kind of intrinsic cognitive grounding or self-driven understanding,” Li said.
These actions are “sometimes surprising,” but “finally constrained by knowledge and logic” given by humans, Lee added.
Li’s observation resonates with Deleuze. Deleuze argued that even amidst a creative confusion, the physical and emotional struggle with artist randomness opens up the possibilities of creativity.
“It’s as if the painter is trying to combine it all, expecting something to come, something to come,” Deleuze said.
If Deleuze views creativity as a high-stakes act of human risk and creation, today’s AI systems are recombining what is already known.
Li argues that this limit comes with a way in which humanity attempts to expand the scope of what it is possible to “describe” or decode.
“The more we can explain, the more developed our civilization will,” Li said.
Still, “creativity is not enough” to meet the changing needs of human expression, said a professor of philosophy at the University of Polytechnic in the Philippines. Decryption.
What humans can do is “push creativity through AI to invent and reinvent human memories,” Rivas said.
edit Sebastian Sinclair
